The Dynamics of Argumentative Discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
Arguments have always played a central role within logic and philosophy. But little attention has been paid to arguments as distinctive kind of discourse, with its own semantics pragmatics. The goal this essay is study the mechanisms by means which we make in starting from argument connectives such ‘therefore’. While some proposals made literature, they fail account for anaphoric behavior ‘therefore’, well uses complex arguments, suppositional non-declarative conclusions, parenthetical remarks. We argue that comprehensive requires imposing tree-like structure on contexts. show how extend our accommodate modal subordination different flavors connectives.
منابع مشابه
on the relationship between using discourse markers and the quality of expository and argumentative academic writing of iranian english majors
the aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency and the type of discourse markers used in the argumentative and expository writings of iranian efl learners and the differences between these text features in the two essay genres. the study also aimed at examining the influence of the use of discourse markers on the participants’ writing quality. to this end the discourse markers us...
15 صفحه اولAnalyzing the Structure of Argumentative Discourse
Consider a discourse situation where the speaker tries to convince the hearer of a particular point of view. The first task for the hearer is to understand what it is the speaker wants him to believe-to analyze the structure of the argument being presented, before judging credibility and eventually responding. This paper describes a model for the analysis of arguments that includes: • a theory ...
متن کاملAnalyzing Argumentative Discourse Units in Online Interactions
Argument mining of online interactions is in its infancy. One reason is the lack of annotated corpora in this genre. To make progress, we need to develop a principled and scalable way of determining which portions of texts are argumentative and what is the nature of argumentation. We propose a two-tiered approach to achieve this goal and report on several initial studies to assess its potential.
متن کاملIdentifying Argumentative Discourse Structures in Persuasive Essays
In this paper, we present a novel approach for identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. The structure of argumentation consists of several components (i.e. claims and premises) that are connected with argumentative relations. We consider this task in two consecutive steps. First, we identify the components of arguments using multiclass classification. Second, we clas...
متن کاملheterogeneity within the orientalist discourse: representation of the orient in womens travelogues and mens paintings
from 1950s onward, new theories and critical approaches burgeoned across humanities. these theories were context-oriented; as a result, the analysis of discursive practices gained significance. thus, social, political, historical and cultural discourses that have been hitherto marginalized and considered inferior to literary texts, were introduced as important texts to be analyzed by critics. o...
ذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Philosophical Logic
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1573-0433', '0022-3611']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09636-2